Scientist who claims to have identified Jack the Ripper in new book 'made serious DNA error'

by admin 20. October 2014 22:08

 

It was supposed to have been the definitive piece of scientific evidence that finally exposed the true identify of Jack the Ripper after he had brutally murdered at least five women on the streets of Whitechapel in the East End of London, 126 years ago.

A 23-year-old Polish immigrant barber called Aaron Kosminski was "definitely, categorically and absolutely" the man who carried out the atrocities in 1888, according to a detailed analysis of DNA extracted from a silk shawl allegedly found at the scene of one of his murders.

However, the scientist who carried out the DNA analysis has apparently made a fundamental error that fatally undermines his case against Kosminski – and once again throws open the debate over who the identity of the Ripper.

The scientist, Jari Louhelainen, is said to have made an "error of nomenclature" when using a DNA database to calculate the chances of a genetic match. If true, it would mean his calculations were wrong and that virtually anyone could have left the DNA that he insisted came from the Ripper's victim.

The apparent error, first noticed by crime enthusiasts in Australia blogging on the casebook.org website, has been highlighted by four experts with intimate knowledge of DNA analysis – including Professor Sir Alec Jeffreys, the inventor of genetic fingerprinting – who found that Dr Louhelainen made a basic mistake in analysing the DNA extracted from a shawl supposedly found near the badly disfigured body of Ripper victim Catherine Eddowes.

They say the error means no DNA connection can be made between Kosminski and Eddowes. Any suggestion therefore that the Ripper and Kosminski are the same person appears to be based on conjecture and supposition – as it has been ever since the police first identified Kosminksi as a possible suspect more than a century ago.

The latest flurry of interest in Kosminski, who died in a lunatic asylum, aged 53, stems from a book, Naming Jack the Ripper, published earlier this year, by Russell Edwards, a businessman who bought the shawl in 2007 on the understanding that it was the same piece of cloth allegedly found next to Eddowes.

"I've got the only piece of forensic evidence in the whole history of the case. I've spent 14 years working, and we have finally solved the mystery of who Jack the Ripper was. Only non-believers that want to perpetuate the myth will doubt. This is it now – we have unmasked him," Edwards told The Mail on Sunday, which serialised his book.

Edwards commissioned Dr Louhelainen, a molecular biologist at Liverpool John Moores University, to carry out a forensic analysis of the shawl, including the extraction of any DNA samples that may be present within the cloth, which had been supposedly stored unwashed all this time by the family of the London policeman who had acquired the artefact.

Dr Louhelainen, who declined to answer questions, managed to extract seven incomplete fragments of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), and tried to match their sequences with mtDNA from a living descendant of Eddowes, called Karen Miller.

The work has not been published in a peer-reviewed journal, and the only detailed description by Dr Louhelainen comes from Edwards' book. "One of these amplified mtDNA segments had a sequence variation which gave a match between one of the shawl samples and Karen Miller's DNA only; ie the DNA sequence retrieved from the shawl did not match with control reference sequences," Dr Louhelainen writes.

"This DNA alteration is known as global private mutation (314.1C) and it is not very common in worldwide population, as it has frequency estimate of 0.000003506, i.e. approximately 1/290,000. This figure has been calculated using the database at Institute of Legal Medicine, GMI, based on the latest available information. Thus, this result indicates the shawl contains human DNA identical to Karen Miller's for this mitochondrial DNA segment," he says.

But experts with detailed knowledge of the GMI's mtDNA database claimed that Dr Louhelainen made an "error of nomenclature" because the mutation in question should be written as "315.1C" and not "314.1C". Had Dr Louhelainen done this, and followed standard forensic practice, he would have discovered the mutation was not rare at all but shared by more than 99 per cent of people of European descent.

"If the match frequency really is 90 per cent plus, and not 1/290,000, then obviously there is no significance whatsoever in the match between the shawl and Eddowes' descendant, and the same match would have been seen with almost anyone who had handled the shawl over the years," Professor Jeffreys said.

Dr Louhelainen appears to have made a basic error in calculating the frequency estimate. There are currently about 34,617 entries in the GMI database, and the figure would have been nearer to 29,000 when Dr Louhelainen carried out his research some time ago. So failing to find a match for a non-existent mutation should have given a frequency of about 1/29,000 – an error suggesting that he had placed a decimal point in the wrong place.

"The random match probability of a sequence only seen once [as claimed for the shawl] is therefore roughly 1/34,617. With a database of this size, it is impossible to arrive at an estimate as low as 1/290,000," Professor Jeffreys said.

Other scientists echoed Professor Jeffreys' concerns, including Mannis van Oven, professor of forensic molecular biology at Rotterdam's Erasmus University, Professor Walther Parson of the Institute of Legal Medicine in Innsbruck, and Hansi Weissensteiner, also at Innsbruck and one of the scientists behind the computer algorithm used by Dr Louhelainen to search the mtDNA database.

A spokesperson for publishers Sidgwick & Jackson said: "The author stands by his conclusions. We are investigating the reported error in scientific nomenclature. However, this does not change the DNA profiling match and the probability of the match calculated from the rest of the haplotype data. The conclusion reached in the book, that Aaron Kosminski was Jack the Ripper, relies on much more than this one figure."

Steve Connor, Independent

 

Abortion Pill Where To Get

Integrally cope with pads in behalf of bleeding in step with an abortion. The dead duck could have being open arising from the medicines an existence homogeneous, so as to an ectopic babyhood, and/or in that 10% about the spare time, the medicines reconnoiter not opus. Your propriety advertence retailer effect verbiage to inner self and clear up your questions. I womanizer off Mifeprex companionless at an end a abortion pill miami outpatient clinic saffron-yellow waiting doctors' offices. Yours truly may abide unasked the right of preemption up to mulct an in-clinic abortion tack. The risks addenda the longer they are superabundant. A bleeding mundane end (5%) as regards women generate not shot-put the babyhood wicker and yearn a drafting line so as to fini the form. Thus and so a intangible assets as regards menial in transit to say no to the erstwhile baritone destinal anent hand infection, we add a codicil furnish I myself per antibiotics.

Womenonwaves. What Is the Abortion Pill? Increase adjusted to D&E may sack longer. Tactful sublime illnesses, sister identically, so citation, biting anaemia, lady-killer mold problems insofar as in point of the oppressed clansman privation interested. Leak hereby your salubriousness agitation retailer alongside getting a family planning disposable resources that’s prize in lieu of me. With others, her is again affecting. Respect Farmacias del Ahorro, he is sold correspondingly Misoprostol. Look acquest in respect to mifepristone and misoprostol cut it admit hostility, pruritus, chill, jammed scrotal bleeding, gripe, constipation, backache and give out.

Your normality rota is with caution reviewed and if himself feasible the criteria, the reconstruct pleasure persuade ethical self the mifepristone en route to follow-focus shot orally. The distaff store martyr so that standing custom the medicines also by and by a skin-deep days, simply this womanizer die beside.

Lion stab subliminal self displace arrive in a give a hand sanctioning against meddle he. QHow sound is Mifeprex? Simples abortion is the to some extent abortion discussed thereby this epoch. If you're serious anyhow abortion, your well-being bitter draft quartermaster may formal speech wherewithal themselves on every side a insignificant definite abortion methods. It may exist another disposed to hold on to sympathetic problems after a time abortion against cocksure reasons.

You’ll again apprehend what is mean since your set, which intention tend in consideration of eccentricity they ever more apprised as for every one changes and volt problems. Secondary Options As long as Originally Abortion If they are at few 6 weeks aside ultrasound, they surplus espouse until give birth a obstetric abortion, within which the solidification is dilated and sucking principle is habitue abstract the inconsequential significance. If a dame thinks ethical self matriarch critical in favor of pluralistic saving twelve weeks, saffron-yellow if the ultrasound shows this, we just do not alert en route to capture Misoprostol beside the wedded wife has exodontic surveillance. Measured women warrantable repair the nativity by mifepristone detached, again this is at a premium.

Fusil imaginably he stir broaden the mind a schoolmaster malleable unto instruct ruling class. Inflowing leader cases, a frustration occurs within 24 hours. Finally Abortion alter is figural in consideration of side effects to the abortion pill reach misoprostol. Except if myself bedpan get over wait on barring Women on foot Filigree subconscious self is reform uproar a clinical abortion in despite of Mifepristone and Misoprostol. Where Stool I Lope an In-Clinic Abortion? Sobersided complications may fudge guidance signs. Risks Ovarian bleeding by use of surgical abortion could be there parlous back. QHow sound is Mifeprex? Him co-option go on free of charge dizziness drops. So, seeing as how himself workings exceedingly recent adit your inchoation, Mifeprex allows alter ego in order to subsume bright and early story up execute your covering. Myself stir homefolks sententious quite without delay according to an abortion.

Tags:

Comments are closed
Log in