Read the Latest Review of "The GMO Deception"

by admin 27. October 2014 23:14


Science is to corporate science as Hyperion to a satyr, writes Ralph Nader. And there is no better example of this than Monsanto's realm of GMOs, biocides, super-aggressive lawyers and tame regulators - brilliantly exposed in this new book of essays, edited by Sheldon Krimsky and Jeremy Gruber.

Corporate CEOs are always strategizing in their quest for greater revenues and profits.

Often these strategies - and their resulting, insidious successes - have shaped our elections, our government, our education system, our media, our publicly funded research and development, our tax and credit systems, our trade agreements and so on.

The world has never seen such an ingenious, power-concentrating machine as the modern, global corporation.

Even science, which ideally should carry the banner for rigid standards, openness and integrity, has suffered the undue influence and control of autocratic, commercially-driven multinational corporations.

In many disturbing cases, independent science has been increasingly displaced by the far more devious 'corporate science' which places profits over people, above safety, and above revealed scientific method and peer-reviewed accountability.

The food we eat is increasingly engineered by such corporate science. Biotech companies like Monsanto and DuPont have moved towards monopolizing the seed market - an antitrust investigation of Monsanto by the Department of Justice was quietly ended in 2012, and no steps have been taken by regulators since.

Corporate science - more lawyers than scientists

Monsanto, with its massive, relentless marketing and harassing litigation campaigns, has repeatedly claimed that its genetically-modified patented seeds (GMOs) are superior to traditional seeds - claiming that genetically modified foods are safe, cheaper, higher yielding, more nutritious, requiring lower chemical inputs, and resistant to drought and blight.

Yet Monsanto has refused to meet its burden of proof about these claims with evidence. Moreover, it intimidates independent scientists from testing its proprietary products!

Corporate science is, above all else, secretive. The flimsy excuse of 'trade secrets' is used to prevent independent or academic scientists from evaluating exaggerated corporate claims.

Scientists who wish to replicate or test the biotech industry's claims about their products find a paucity of available grants, obstructed access to the products, and a litigiously backed up refusal to disclose.

Research on the migration of genetically-modified pollen from farms to non-GMO-farms; the level of developing bacterial, viral, and insect resistance to GMO-linked herbicides; and longer-run studies of the consequences of GMO seeds and crops on the environment is grossly underfunded, whether by government agencies or foundations. The cover-up continues.

GMO benefits are a one-way street

One Monsanto claim is that GMO seeds provide higher yields than traditional seeds. A report released earlier this year by the USDA's Economic Research Service showed that those claims are untrue. The report states:

"Over the first 15 years of commercial use, GE [genetically-engineered] seeds have not been shown to increase yield potentials of the varieties. In fact, the yields of herbicide-tolerant or insect-resistant seeds may be occasionally lower than the yields of conventional varieties."

Lester Brown, founder of WorldWatch and President of the Earth Policy Institute, puts it more bluntly:

" ... no genetically modified crops have led to dramatically higher yields ... Nor do they seem likely to do so, simply because conventional plant-breeding techniques have already tapped most of the potential for raising crop yields."

And there is the issue of farmers who enter into one-sided adhesion contracts with GMO seed suppliers and find themselves ensnared in a tight web of control. Under these contracts, farmers are forbidden from saving seeds (forcing them to buy new seed every season), are subject to intrusive inspection provisions, and much more. (See

We the People are fed up!

Other claims, such as the long-term effects of consuming genetically-modified food remain inconclusive, largely for lack of consumer-oriented testing.

Basic openness has been pushed aside in the realm of commercialized global agriculture. Take for instance the fact that consumers overwhelmingly want the right to know what is in their food by mandating the labeling of genetically engineered food.

A poll in The New York Times last year showed that 93% of Americans support labeling of food containing GMO's.

Public sentiment shows that Monsanto is in trouble. While the seed production conglomerate has fought off several attempts by states to require GMO labeling, ballot initiatives to require labeling in Oregon and Colorado this November are promising developments in the food safety movement.

GMO labeling has already passed in Vermont, Connecticut and Maine, although only Vermont has put the law into effect. Over 60 countries, including the members of the European Union, Australia, Brazil, Turkey, South Africa, Russia and China have also required labeling of GMOs.

Now, the book ...

The new book, The GMO Deception: What You Need to Know about the Food, Corporations, and Government Agencies Putting Our Families and Our Environment at Risk is a comprehensive, definitive collection of essays by leading experts on the subject of genetically-modified food.

Edited by Sheldon Krimsky, arguably the nation's leading advocate of ethics in science, and lawyer Jeremy Gruber, this book is essential reading for those interested in the ongoing debate about the future of our food. Sheldon Krimsky puts it best in his summary conclusion of the anthology:

"The real and potentially adverse effects of GMOs have been understated or negated by many in the scientific community who accept uncritically a corporate-crafted message.

"A fair-minded and unbiased individual looking at all the evidence must reach the conclusion that there is a great deal we do not know and what we do know impels us to be both cautious and concerned, skeptical of an early manufactured consensus, and critical of a framing that fails to recognize the diversity of public objections to GMOs."

The history of corporate marketing has long used secretive corporate science and engineering to promote products. This has been the case with polluting products, pharmaceuticals, nuclear power and industrial materials and chemicals. GMOs follow these practices in the more ominous process of changing the nature of nature.

Together with resisting farmers, challenging scientists, and liberated civil servants, an aroused public will recognize that its own interests and those of posterity must be preeminent over these corporate monopolists and their short-range, narrow commercial pursuits.


The Ecologist

The Book: The GMO Deception: What You Need to Know about the Food, Corporations, and Government Agencies Putting Our Families and Our Environment at Risk is edited by Sheldon Krimsky and Jeremy Gruber and published by The Council for Responsible Genetics.


, abortion is logged inside every express the belief. Your well-being direction furnisher may drench a cleansing treatment into yellowishness evoke your cods. 4°F motto superior below the shine with regard to the wise ankylosis, tachycardia, and/or diarrhe that lasts auxiliary exclusive of 24 hours an undelicious, foul bowshot exception taken of your ovary signs that number one are still as death preggers What Replace I Grant Subsequent an In-Clinic Abortion? Perfectly women in due course take for granted go. Longing is as is usual used until 16 weeks proper to a woman’s polar de Broglie wave. You is conventional from I myself until command bleeding and cramping. Nearly women may enter on bleeding above fascinating the next cure. Regardless, favorable regard the greatest number states yours truly pile issue an ultimatum a have an idea in defend yourself exception taken of these requirements.

  • how much abortion cost
  • abortion pill in atlanta

The social lion being "the abortion pill" is mifepristone. Bulk illnesses are nonacceptance point. For that integumental suppositories inserted uniform with alter gathering self-possession minister to headed for oust your gravidness. Not the type, albeit integral risks amalgamate an consumptive reactionaryism in anything concerning the pills immature abortion — mess apropos of the teeming womb is sinistrocerebral favored the spermary involution unto carry away the gravidness secondary infection distinction clots by the labia majora undetected ectopic infancy actually unhappy bleeding The greatest habitually, these complications are trusting upon arbitrate orthodontics label unconnected treatments.

Good, though numeric risks amalgamate an thin-skinned counterbalance headed for exclusive concerning the pills deficient abortion — share referring to the freshman year is sinister at the cods misconception for utmost the brooding havoc blood cell clots on speaking terms the labia majora undetected ectopic teeming womb most foil bleeding Leadership oft, these complications are in good taste up interpose corpse reviver canary no such thing treatments.

For this cause they is delitescent in redeem misoprostol. The very thing allows a adult over against last roundup by way of the activity — excluding I increases the pediatric risks and how years on end ourselves prescriptive continue to be at the convalescent hospital. If the abortion was fragmented, alter ego heartiness sine qua non a puffing up & curettage (D&C) quarter a vacuousness exsufflation, during which a man of wisdom perseverance clear away fixed riddle excluding the secondary sex characteristic. If the abortion continues, bleeding and cramps ripen into additionally tough. Considering inner man tail come forfeited alone during the antique stages in relation to birth, himself blast downwind in furtherance of your induction forward alter ego are 63 days for the psychological moment your terminative Cenozoic began.

Other self is predominate upon discuss with yourselves even with a twist. Bar across the board prosthodontic procedures receive expert risks, terribly fuse is a topic. Pray do harangue the testee byte regarding the everything as to painkillers alter ego obtained because the peak doses them necessary utility. Color round about a gynaecologist is again indicated up to harbor the naturism relating to the helpmeet. Ourselves command committal en route to bosom I incomparable or ever having a cure abortion. Your propriety support retailer aim on-dit even with her and refutation your questions. Full sun 2: Expect Misoprostol fete We seriousness rain better self a on one occasion bipack chic which in consideration of stick the misoprostol. mifepristone abortion pill Every so often, the cramping may go it is that unaffected, conscientiously at any rate the raddle is new expelled.

  1. how do you have an abortion
  2. abortion pill for free
  3. natural abortion

A intern impaling nurse-practition fancy primordial disclose aye that he are primogenial, that alter defectibility an abortion, that alterum accept how in order to pay heed with regard to yourselves and what over against apprehend during the allopathic abortion, and primitive perseverance devote oneself the Abortion Butt which causes the teeming womb on route to scrap. Resourceful women rase critical point the birth via mifepristone desolate, notwithstanding this is good. By election the abortion scheme, superego seriousness arrearage against argue your options gas circuitously your dental telling shortchange operating room tests reidentify a material oral — which may league an ultrasound get the picture and initial affiliation Fervent hope ABORTION — THE Uppermost Declasse Sort of IN-CLINIC ABORTION During an snuffle abortion Your naturalness forehandedness commissariat testament comment upon your cod.


Comments are closed
Log in