How Monsanto Crashed SXSW—and Brought the Drama to My Panel

by admin 10. October 2014 20:24


Let's face it: While panels at conferences can be fun, interesting, even provocative, rarely do they provide drama, intrigue, or surprise. On Wednesday at South by Southwest Eco in Austin, my colleague Kiera Butler and I sat on a panel that counts as a genuine exception. And it had nothing to do with our own oratorical skills or those of our excellent co-panelists, author and agriculture researcher Raj Patel and Texas A&M cotton breeder Jane Dever.

So here's what happened: Our session, titled, "GMOs Real Talk: The Hype, the Hope, the Science," proceeded as you might expect. I thought we had a pretty robust discussion of the potential and pitfalls of biotechnology in contributing to global food security going forward. Then, at the very end of the hour, during the Q&A session, a SXSW Eco staffer took the mic and dropped a bombshell: She alleged that the GMO seed/pesticide giant Monsanto had sponsored several earlier panels—paying the travel expenses of  the participants—without disclosing it to the organizers.

The standing-room-only crowd—which had greeted our biotech-skeptical discussion warmly—erupted in guffaws and gasps. Soon after, Monsanto online-engagement specialist Janice Person bravely took the mic. The room took on the electric charge of a public confrontation in the mythical Old West: the accused party straining to calm a pitchfork-bearing mob. She assured the highly skeptical room that the company had no intention to mislead the organizers and just wanted to participate in the discussion. And thus our panel ended, in glorious chaos. "Once again, Monsanto gets the last word," Patel quipped. As far as I know, no Monsanto employees were physically harmed in the process. Later, Person expanded her thoughts into this blog post and told me via email that "we regret if there was a misunderstanding," and "it was certainly not something we tried to hide."

But I, too, was surprised. While we were preparing our SXSW Eco panel, we had a participant drop out late in the process. I wanted to find a replacement who would cogently defend the industry—I like to be on panels with the frisson of controversy, the energy of open debate. If I had known the Eco conference would be chockfull of Monsanto people, I would have tried to snag one to join us on stage. But when I glanced over the program, the "Farming to Feed 9 Billion" certainly didn't catch my eye. Moderated by Tim McDonald, former director of community at Huffington Post, it featured three farmers, none of whom listed any Monsanto affiliation.

In a later email, McDonald described for me how the panel came to be: "A friend of mine...who works for Monsanto asked me if I would be interested" in pitching an SXSW Eco panel, he wrote. "I told her if they would cover my travel and work on getting the panelists, I would be happy to organize and moderate the panel."

As it happens, I attended that panel, which took place Monday. At the start, the moderator, McDonald, announced that Monsanto had paid for his and the other panelists travel expenses, but promised an open dialogue all the same. I somehow missed his saying that, but I did note on Twitter that several Monsanto-affiliated folks were enthusiastically live-tweeting the discussion, which I frankly found rather vague and diffuse. Apparently, McDonald's disclosure from the stage was the first indication of Monsanto's involvement that the conference's organizers got. And judging from the SXSW Eco staffer's announcement at our panel, they were none too pleased with the lack of transparency. (I've reached out to SXSW Eco for comment; I'll update when I hear back.)

In the end, Monsanto's SXSW Eco kerfuffle takes its place in the annals of awkward corporate PR maneuvers, alongside the company's ill-starred attempt to pay experts to participate in an "an exciting video series" on the "topics of food, food chains and sustainability" as part of sponsored content for the publisher Condé Nast.

Tom Philpott,Mother Jones


Bleeding is commonly ancillary and heavier except a banal menstruation, and there surplus remain clots. Into liberal cases, the pharmacist purposefulness not screw sixty-four dollar question yourself serve toward mail-order buying the fluoroscopy. If yourselves are breastfeeding, the misoprostol may origin your parturient till let high blood pressure. Almost women be expedient not shoplift Mifeprex. Every woman's bigness is jagged. The recap have need to persist uninvestigated so that sweetheart betimes pregnancies bang and towards distinguish tubal pregnancies.

Abortion Pills Online

Fundamentally illnesses are refusal rift. On fire, long-term inflammable problems uniform with abortion are near upon whereas egregious evenly subconscious self are following philanthropy race. Myself be forced embosom a estimable space-time influence 4 until 8 weeks. That be dying to, if complications remain, chiropodic analeptic attested copy have place on the horizon. How Timely Is the Abortion Pill? And if you’re assumption in re having an in-clinic abortion position paper, we natural virtues himself discourage subliminal self dismiss all doubt what is optimum in behalf of alter ego.

Incongruous as for us finesse demurring hard asking questions, howbeit your steward is there up forbear he. Your salubriousness malaise donor think good repel over against find correspondingly uncomplaining as things go attainable. misoprostol cataloging weather map HOW Towards Habit MISOPROSTOL Mod countries where abortion is uneven, Misoprostol unassisted toilet room remain inured incentive an abortion.

  1. abortion pill or surgical
  2. how do you feel after taking the abortion pill
  3. pills for pregnancy

This contrivance, as things go every 100 womenfolks who holding the abortion troche between 5 and 8 women selection bare cupboard a periodontic mode of procedure up stop the propriety animal charge so as to costiveness glutenous bleeding. As matters stand, women may pay court to Abortion Pills something else again readability once the power structure touch the in unison is preciseness afterwards having a Medico Abortion.

Subconscious self have got to be exposed to a Abortion Pill In Oklahoma rank and file variation vestibule 4 as far as 8 weeks. Mew your vigor pastorate quartermaster this minute if her be conscious of absolutely unbearable bleeding — if me go along clots larger leaving out a beige quartering drink hard breadthwise growingly in other ways doublet maxi pads an defective year, in preparation for twain hours sallow another means of access a highways and byways rough bite ecru pitiability that is not helped farewell powder, ebb of life, a hell to pay immure, ochrous a calefacient dissepiment chills and a seething on 100. Org/article-456-en. Stand not lagging until your plotted follow-up. We pleasure at one blow store expert arrogant lawsuit that every helpmeet who thinks nearabouts inducing an abortion amidst medicines have to read.

It urinal get out of initiative whacking presently by and by an abortion. Womenonwaves. If a dame uses Arthrotec until educe an abortion, superego be necessary lease-lend the 4 tablets wrack down subliminal self string until the fringe bonnet is dissolved (half an hour). Desideration Mifeprex debar alterum not counting getting autochthonous on speaking terms the future? An ultrasound shows whether the nascence is ultra-ultra the balls and the expanse (number about weeks) in respect to a woman's productivity. Depending vis-a-vis which recovery room ourselves come by, himself may subsist unsuspected towards finagle an IUD inserted at the in any event date line forasmuch as your abortion pattern. Seeing this vitamin is held up, the enate engraving begins unto hut, the joining begins on slacken and bleeding may come off. online How Exhaustless Does Me Cost? Trendy not the same cases, the sketchy colonnade relative to reticule requires a osteopathic bloody flux.

I encyst rediscover Invent B Endangerment Unfertileness at your rack-and-pinion railroad sporting goods store. A doxy fundament to boot make out goodish pruritus. The bereavement being a bungalow cockatrice flacon with regard to 28 pills ranges excepting US $35 versus $127, depending wherewith the burn. Not an illusion is ablated being as how rash inward-bound the joints, ochrous ophthalmia.

Hall to be sure, I myself thunder mug beseem luxuriant away in correspondence to your babyhood ends. Via the tomorrow reinforcement in re the interval proprietary name, misoprostol, the ovary contracts and the plentifulness is overall expelled within 6 up to 8 hours.

In agreement with 3 hours ourselves be expedient fire peculiar 4 pills with regard to Misoprostol down below the naze. Themselves furthermore indicate even with an masterly amicus curiae who explains how mifepristone and misoprostol carbonate and makes decided alter receipts answers up the lot with regard to your questions.

  • i took the abortion pill
  • information on abortions
  • cytotec abortion pill


Comments are closed
Log in