GENEWATCH
 
Volume 23 Issue 4
 
 
Volume 23 Issue 4
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
Aug-Sep 2010
 
Lessons Learned: How Berkeley Came to Abruptly Change Its Genetic Testing Program
By Jeremy Gruber
 
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: What’s the Prognosis?
By Jordan P. Lerner-Ellis, J. David Ellis, Robert Green
 
The Broken Clock: Accuracy and Utility of DTC Tests
By CRG staff - interview with James Evans
 
Consumer Genomics and the Empowered Patient
By Paul Billings
 
Not What the Doctor Ordered
By Sheldon Krimsky
 
DTC Genetic Testing: A UK Perspective
By Helen Wallace
 
False Reassurance
By CRG staff - interview with Adele Schneider
 
In Their Words: 23andMe
By CRG staff - interview with Anne Wojcicki and Ashley Gould
 
Genetic Counselors: Don't Get Tested Without One
By CRG staff - interview with Elizabeth Kearney
 
DTC Genetic Testing: Consumer Privacy Concerns
By Jeremy Gruber
 
The $1,000 Genome: Caveat Emptor
By Andrew D. Thibedeau
 
A View From the Inside
By Nancy Connell
 
DNA Profiling Is Tested in California
By CRG Staff
 
Fishy Business at the FDA
By Eric Hoffman
 
Editorial
By Samuel W. Anderson
 
 
Search: GeneWatch
 
 
 
The use of forensic DNA databases by law enforcement around the globe is expanding at a rate that should be of great concern to civil libertarians.
 
View Project
 
 
The purpose of the Genetic Bill of Rights is to introduce a global dialogue on the fundamental values that have been put at risk by new applications of genetics.
 
View Project
 
 
Tools
PAGE TOOLS
 
 
 
 
ON THE WEB